On 31/08/2007, stevertigo <stvrtg(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/31/07, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
They did no such thing.
Ah, thank you Geni for that concise, but detailed explanation.
Details are tricky but note the edit summery:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MediaWiki:Anonnotice&diff=153…
Next time, you can just boil it down to
"pointless rubbish" and save your
fingers the trouble. No doubt it bothers you to have to respond to such
"pointless rubbish" at all, so why get CTS while doing it?
Thanks again so much for your opinion.
Nyet. I would regard anything not of immediate significant global
importance (24 hour database lock coming up that kind of thing) placed
in sitenotice to be a problem. This does not mean it would be
pointless just a really bad idea. Placing what you suggested in anon
notice would be largely pointless since the things you list are not
really the kind of things non editors want to work on.
--
geni