-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Justin Cormack wrote:
On 27 Oct 2005, at 05:06, geni wrote:
No it shoulds be dissregarded because WP:POINT. I take it you conceed
that the nominator did in fact take more effort to nominate than you
did to vote.
The nominator is just wasting everyones time. In one case the article is
a joke (Mattism), but was listed as "NN D". This is not helpful,
especially
as it means that everyone who wants to vote has to do the research rather
than the nominator. One of the articles was part of a series, so
nominating
it alone was stupid (I think he did it as it had school in the name).
The amount of time wasted makes this tantamount to vandalism and I think
blocking the user from VfD would be a suitable response.
I invite you to join [[WP:RFC/AfD]]. Yes, that's a valid shortcut. Yes,
the targets are probably wrong, so I invite you to add more on a case-by
case basis.
- --
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613 | X Against HTML email & vCards
http://tinyurl.com/cc9up | / \
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQEVAwUBQ2C1z7MAAH8MeUlWAQh7vQf/aGB63eRkTWhtfmzyGFgmPpGiojCMf8CY
El1sF/2ckD0FqWtpku/fjXRR/4+FcrdMFNjhRZLHrHfHYihKMof33MhHQotsH5kA
Ia3jd13VMAcbDIddnwDG/TeiWNaLgLoaRrv1nkrymWvYNMlUdnKw5V+OOl4IyAc6
IFpNjmjiy7nvtXElMAo0KEYoGdzTYGAo1zKE/rAjDkuht92rYRPQOal6IfN8OyKU
uNud7ix12Iby7ObpuzNYOFSvYh/br4UAaUdVxkcZ2MVN4KVC4gq2AWVt4JZoEIpn
qbPLBYNsaYXX2oagom6YoO1VjFuIrDZyVrtb/H5cb9Mrl2ij/gNHCA==
=xieJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----