Re: [WikiEN-l] 7. Re: Zero information is preferred to

------------------------------ Message: 8 Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 19:17:12 -0700 From: Philip Welch <wikipedia(a)philwelch.net> Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] 7. Re: Zero information is preferred to misleading or false To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org> Message-ID: <83E0935F-1C7A-47F7-9544-98D727E5BA62(a)philwelch.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On May 17, 2006, at 6:33 PM, Earthhope Action Network wrote: All you just proved was your unwillingness to see anything but what the group of nasty admins and others like the depraved SwatJester. I don't have to listen to your insults any more than you have to listen to mine. The difference between you and me is that I would never advocate punitive actions to soothe my wounded feelings. You would and do. Also editors are terrified to speak their mind, the ones that would defend me for fear of the axe coming down on them next. Corbin Simpson did speak up for me. He was lucky they didn't block him. Please see the rfa oppose section on Swatjester's rfc http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Swatjester Either that or you are just another example of one who is susceptible to groupthink which is no thought at all. BTW is it okay for admins to refer to kids as turds? Bishonen told me my remarks to an editor John Kinney were obscene, the (beginning or our personal and mutual dislike.) Here is Geogre calling children turds (to Bishonen) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Bishonen/Archive_14#Haymarket.2C_etc. +:Oh, and for comparison, see the history tab on Attalus I. It has been vandalized even more than yours was. I think, when it's an interesting story, the turds vandalize it less. The 11 year olds ''clearly'' don't like Attalus I. ("You must be this tall to ride the Wikipedia.") [[User:Geogre|Geogre]] 21:06, 25 April 2006 (UTC) I could go on and on here , but rather than waste my time.. How about this atfq if you would just answer the fucking question(s). I'm stillt wondering. I am an editor, who has been blocked indefinitely from editing on Wikipedia and never had any RfC, ArbCom, mediation, or any dispute resolution at all. Never. Just wondering why this was. And also wondering why my unblock request was removed. Will you please just answer these questions. Your answer to unblock request move and the entire process didn't cut it I'm afraid. Policy is being broken. I Never had Any Mediation or Any dispute Resolution. Every single thing the admins did was done in direct violation of Wikipedia Policy I've been here for two years. So have many of the people on this list. I think we know Wikipedia policy better than you. ----- That's interesting. If you know the policy better than I do, then why don't you follow it? -----in peace and justice for the wildthings Margie Laupheimer http://earthhopenetwork.net/