I don't imagine the current AC (I cannot speak for
though I fully expect they would say the same) will penalise you for
other people causing conflict with you.
But you did. I didn't asked to be stalked, and I was even clear about what
provoked it so I can't even be blamed for being the victim of vandalism.
I believe Geni made some apt comments on this mailing
list about how it
feels to be constantly blocked.
If people abuse the AC decision to block you spuriously, I expect the
AC will have some very clear things to say on the matter.
But you didn't. I specifically asked you to review such a block, and no
comment was made on it by any arbitrator (well, except Fred Bauder in his
mailing list post, but he was recused).
I believe we are giving you the chance to show yourself to be a
legitimate user. That is my intention. I am certain
that none of the
AC considers reversions of vandalism to count in your ruling. I
personally undertake to unblock you if anyone blocks you for reverting
Well this reflects well on you; at least one member of the AC is willing to
commit to something positive. Instead of Raul talking down to me like he
owes no one a fair shake.
me on those points. But not a peep has been uttered
about what I raised.
Visit not the sins of the father on the son. I was myself not a
member of that committee, and do not consider myself responsible for
the decisions, whether they were right or wrong.
I'm not saying you are personally responsible, but as you now are part of
the AC you can take institutional responsibility, like governments do. Or
if that's too much, add a "finding of fact" that the past ruling was in
We have undertaken to look at your case again when we have some more
evidence to base our actions on. If you can manage
four months of
good editing (and I see no reason why you cannot), your restrictions
will likely be lifted. That doesn't fulfill my description of "get
Well there was already quite a lot of evidence my contributions history.
Maybe the third time would be the charm, but why after two crash-and-burns
should I be hopeful?
Anyway, I feel like you're asking me to make a bunch of uncontroversial
(frivolous?) edits (what did I say, on bunnies and flowers). Anyone can do
that and it proves nothing, so yes it seems you're just telling me off for
another length of time.