On 3/1/06, Matt Brown <morven(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/1/06, Steve Bennett
<stevage(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Whereas now it's more like, "cite a
source, or else someone else
will delete your work".
And we were asking for proof that policy was being largely shaped by
those who work on contentious, war-zone articles?
Which in many ways is understandable, as those who work on
non-contentious articles with like-minded editors don't really need
policy.
Understandable but unfortunate. It would be healthier if the
aggressive policy versions were back in the "guideline" category -- or
put into the dispute resolution sections. The general policy for the
site should be friendlier, I think.