He has been asked for his retional and has not provided. Check his talk
page, you'll will find my rational written down there. What we have here is a
london from Camden I think, going through catogrising things when they
don't know what they are.
These things are best left in the Liverpool Catgory as explained in my
outline of what I think should be happening. Why it objects to this is
unknown, why it thinks removing the [[Category:Liverpool]] is unkown.
It seem people consider my lack of resposne unwiki why not this idiot?
Date sent: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:35:30 +0100 (BST)
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Vandli 126.96.36.199 has started redoing his edits
still without an explanation, still without answering any questions.
From: "Tony Sidaway" <minorityreport(a)bluebottle.com>
Send reply to: minorityreport(a)bluebottle.com,
English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org>
John Bradley said:
Vandal 188.8.131.52 has started redoing his
edits still without an
explanation, still without answering any questions. This constitutes a
personal attack on me.
How are his edits vandalism? In
, for instance, he has
simply refined the category from "Liverpool" to "Arts and entertainment
Liverpool", and in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Beatles_Story
refined the category from "Liverpool" to "Visitor attractions in
Liverpool" They may not be the best edits, but they're clearly good-faith
changes intended to structure the Liverpool category. I believe that the
categories in question are both subcategories of "Liverpool" and of other
relevant categories (such as "Arts and entertainment in the UK by
As to your claim that making edits that you disagree with, without
explanation, constitutes "a personal attack" on you, that's obvious
WikiEN-l mailing list
Loc: Flat 15/22 Gambier Terrace, Liverpool, L1 7BL, UK.
Phone: +44 (0)151 708 7238