On May 9, 2006, at 9:07 PM, Cheney Shill wrote:
So your point is "social interaction".
Start a new email thread
with that subject and enjoy. You won't have to "exhaust" yourself
for my social development because I won't be socially interacting
with it. This email subject is very clearly about applying
existing policy and how consensus obstructs and interferes with
doing so. I do appreciate you providing an interactive case
study.~~~~Pro-Lick
Is this an argument for the sake if argument? The explanations given
by several editors is pretty clear, and I fail to understand what
your point is. Can you succintly explain what is your concern and
what is your proposal (if you have any) to ameliorate the situation?
-- Jossi