On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Charles Matthews
<charles.r.matthews(a)ntlworld.com> wrote:
On 06/02/2011 13:53, Samuel Klein wrote:
Tom - Great idea.
I believe what we want to end up with is OSQA, like what OSM has set
up, not a (proprietary) StackOverflow site.
OSQA is a great tool for collaborative knowledge-sharing.
http://meta.osqa.net/questions/127/osqa-vs-stackoverflow-performance-and-fe…
This has to be either-or?
It isn't either-or, and I started following the SO test-site. In the
short-term, people have already started sharing questions there. In
the medium-term, I hope we end up pointing people to a free and open
Q&A site, if any. Supporting the development of OSQA will benefit
knowledge-sharing in the world beyond this particular use of it.
SJ