It's easy to get around all of the banning tecniques, but this would be hard for someone who is just a passerby vandal, as opposed to an advanced cracker (who wouldn't even bother with Wikipedia, for it is too easy). Plus, what if they didn't know it was a cookie blocking them? Another thing, by all means, I don't want to require the enabling of cookies for use of wikipedia. That would be too much of an invasion of privacy, even if it *could* prevent vandals with that tecnique.

 Richard Grevers <lists@dramatic.co.nz> wrote:

So easy that I doubt it would be the least bit effective:
Cookies are - optional in the first place
- easy to find and delete
- unique to each browser (I have 8 to choose from!)
--
Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@wikipedia.org
http://www.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l



Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop!