Given the user's history and current behaviour,
even after the
year-long ban, is there any reason that a permanent ban would be out
of order? As I understand it, the only restriction on the ArbComm's
banning duration is self-imposed.
I would oppose such a move. Most people who get
banned are probably young and immature. Give them
a year to grow up. And if they need another year
when they come back then give them that too :)
Regards,
Haukur