On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 23:57, Ken Arromdee
<arromdee(a)rahul.net> wrote:
If there weren't any anti-scientology
campaigners spreading the word
about
Xenu, we'd still have a reason to have an article about Xenu. If there
was
no
anti-Santorum campaign, we'd have no reason for the article--its entire
existence depends directly on that campaign.
Yes, but there *is* such a campaign.
If there weren't a tea party movement, we wouldn't have an article on
the tea party movement.
But there is. So we do.
If there weren't a neologism named after Mr. Santorum, there wouldn't
be an article on it.
But there is. So we do.
--
Tom Morris
<http://tommorris.org/>
No question the subject is notable. The question is how to handle it
appropriately.
Fred