Why might it not become as reliable as any other magazine discussing media? It depends on the quality of the editing.
David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Ken Arromdeearromdee@rahul.net wrote:
On Sun, 9 Aug 2009 WJhonson@aol.com wrote:
The reason for my objection, is that we, our project, should not put ourselves into a position where we are becoming the main source of financial support for some newly-created effective auxiliary. I hope we can all see, how some obscure online subscription mag like "Pokeman Today" would get a tremendous boost just by being sourced to one of our articles.
It's pretty unlikely that anything like that would be considered a reliable source.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l