The "original" account was claimed to be NoLongerScieno (blocked for
"name..") and the second account was ScienoSitter.
Possible sockpuppet? Certainly.
Worthy of blocking under name block? Maybe.
Wrongful to tag as a "vandalism only" account and wrongful to block for
being a sockpuppet of a username block? Definitely.
On 10/7/06, Guy Chapman aka JzG <guy.chapman(a)spamcop.net> wrote:
On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 17:37:51 -0500, "Parker Peters"
> Oh, plus, blocking is preventative. Is there
a potential problem to
> be averted? Will blocking and then discussing on the user talk page
> be a better result for the project than letting them edit?
In the case I quoted, there was no "blocking
and then discussing on the
talk page", there was instead "blocking
and chain reverting the unblock
template and then getting someone to block them for supposed template
Name names. If it was a Zephram Stark sock, for example, then that is
absolutely as it should be.
WikiEN-l mailing list
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: