On 2/27/08, Wily D <wilydoppelganger(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Why is this discussion so long? We provide porn so
people can learn
about sex & the like. We provide images of women masterbating so
people can learn about ... women masterbating. Doesn't seem like
there's really tons to discuss.
Here's something to discuss:
a) Do you think an amateur photo is necessary to explain the concept
of "woman masturbating"?
b) How many images do you think is enough?
c) Are there any limits to how far your logic should be applied?
Should we provide graphic images of felching, squicking, or for that
matter, decapitating?
Steve