Ya, I know. But if it's officially sanctioned that GNAA can go onto VfD
as many times as people want, then that's not disruption, right? So then
a precedent is set.
Snowspinner wrote:
[[Wikipedia:Don't disrupt Wikipedia to prove a
point]]
-Snowspinner
On Dec 25, 2004, at 7:26 PM,
csherlock(a)ljh.com.au wrote:
> Guys, how many times are we going to list this before we stop this
> abuse of process? This is now the fifth time the article has been on
> votes for deletion and that sucks.
>
> It seems to me that the deletionists won't stop till it's gone. I
> would like to propose that after this vote, we never allow it to be
> listed every again.
>
> If we don't, then I'm considering putting [[Childlove movement]] back
> on VfD until I can gather enough support. Clearly if we're allowed to
> place GNAA on VfD unlimited times then it will be fine to put
> Childlove movement on there till we get rid of it.
>
> Ta bu shi da yu
>
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
>
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>