On Mon, 2 Apr 2007 19:41:28 -0400, "The
Cunctator" wrote:
I didn't know you were a copyright lawyer.
Where did I say that? I said I *think* it's copyright, and gave my
reasoning. In this thread we've seen some sound reasons supporting
the idea it's copyright, and some (IMO) rather weaker ones saying it's
not. Obviously I have asked the BBC and will await their response.
Do you really believe that they can answer objectively when they are the
putative copyright holder>