It gets better - there is a proposal on WT:BLP to change the normal operation of a consensus discussion so that, for BLP articles, its backwards. If this proposal makes its way into policy, the outcome will be this: if an editor nominates a BLP article for deletion, and no consensus for deletion is achieved, it will be deleted. I personally can't see how that makes sense, but apparently a few of the folks on WT:BLP can. Maybe we need a new process - Articles for Keep, where all nominated articles are deleted unless enough people come by to make argue for keeping them.
Nathan
I can certainly understand. We have about 200 folks who want to keep Giovanno di Stefano, a monstrosity that is entirely uncontrollable. I wonder how many of them are willing to spend hours, week, months, years monitoring it.
Fred