On 09/04/07, Steve Summit <scs(a)eskimo.com> wrote:
Jeff Raymond wrote:
Unless you think the newspaper is causing harm,
too.
Some of them surely do.
Which, in that case, well...
Earlier today someone said that having Daniel Brand tell us what
to do was a bad idea. Here I would say that having the National
Enquirer tell us what to do (or what we can do) is also a bad idea.
Determining whether an idea is "good" or "bad" (need we be so
binary?)
based upon who came up with it is a *bad* idea. Surely the merit of an
idea should depend upon the idea itself?
--
Oldak Quill (oldakquill(a)gmail.com)