Andrew Turvey wrote:
-- "Casey Brown" wrote:
Well, that's the media. :-) They're used
to being able to just say
random things like "source: Reuters" that make no sense whatsoever.
;-)
Yeah - but the difference there is that they're actually paying Reuters
for it and using it with their permission!
Sure there is that difference, but it is not *the* difference. How is
the statement "random" or how does it make "no sense". It states
where
they got it from. Howe they got it or under what terms is completely
irrelevant.
Ec