David Gerard wrote:
Your reply to me says "but look at all this smoke!" I suggest it went nowhere because that was the right way for it to go. They utterly failed to make a case.
This, really, is evidence of the problem, though.
You still won't name the people you consider grievous offenders who need to be deleted from the wiki to make everything magically better, and you refuse to consider the mechanisms that do exist because troublesome things like actually convincing people you have a case stand in the way.
If you want the list privately, then by all means with some caveats - I wouldn't tip my hand publically at this stage and get blackballed any further than I already am.
-Jeff