Tony, I don't think that Mark was talking about you :) It's cool... we
know that you are a very good and consientious (spelling?) contributor
to Wikipedia! At least, I think you are anyway.
Ta bu shi da yu
Tony Sidaway wrote:
Mark Richards said:
Deliberate disruption of WP by rampant
deletionists
seems to be tollerated for now. I guess it will have
to cause even more damage before anything is done.
Mark
Again I am forced to correct a false statement to the effect that the
recent listing of GNAA was a deliberate attempt to disrupt Wikipedia. As
a relatively new editor and no deletionist, I listed the article in
ignorance of all but its most recent (three months ago) VfD history, on
the merits. I would not have listed it for a fifth, a fourth, or even a
third time. I have voted Keep and suggested that others opposed to
vindictive listings do otherwise, irrespective of the merits. A line must
be drawn somewhere.