But this list of conditions is irrelevant, as it is
preceded in the
copyright act by: "for purposes such as criticism, comment, news
reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use),
scholarship, or research".
Which one of these purposes applies to this case?
No court has ever held that to be an exclusive list.
Nor has any court, to my knowledge, determined that decoration of
something having nothing to do with the work itself was fair.