On 8/18/07, Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton@gmail.com wrote:
But this list of conditions is irrelevant, as it is preceded in the copyright act by: "for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research".
Which one of these purposes applies to this case?
No court has ever held that to be an exclusive list.
Nor has any court, to my knowledge, determined that decoration of something having nothing to do with the work itself was fair.
Bah, I can't find a case either. Though, I can't find one *either way*.