On 6/30/07, Gwern Branwen <gwern0(a)gmail.com> wrote:
What bothers me is the unclearness of the idea of a
'bibliography'. ...
And to the whole thread. See/fix:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_layout#Standard_appendices_…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_%28lists_of_works%29
My recommendation (made somewhere, a while ago), is that
"Bibliography" be recommended (as part of the MoS) only as a term for
a subject's personal/collaborative works, along the lines of
"Filmography" and "Discography".
Everything else either is, or should be, explained at those 2 links.
"Further reading" is indeed where the list of subject-primer-material
should go, per [[WP:GTL#Further reading]].
Note: [[WP:LOW]] was greatly expanded 3months ago. It used to be very
(too) simple, but was easier to grok at a glance:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_%28list…
Quiddity