I've no idea how the Wikipedia article manages to
get itself represented
twice, with two different titles (one of which redirects to the other).
Personally, I think redirecting the thing to Santorum's BLP and covering
it there would be the "encyclopedic" thing to do.
The comparison to Bowdlerise, Orwellian etc. is IMO unrealistic. Those
neologisms have stood the test of time, and have been used un-consciously
in
prose. "Santorum" is a conscious joke word.
Andreas
Well, too much. I'm on-board for fighting fascism, but not using
Wikipedia as a vehicle. We need to have a policy discussion on-wiki about
this.
I've been actually reading the sources cited; this is interesting and
useful information, but needs to be handled more appropriately by both
Wikipedia and Google. We need to bring the creator, and protector, of the
article into the discussion too.
Fred