On 5/2/07, Phil Sandifer <Snowspinner(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On May 2, 2007, at 10:31 AM, Anthony wrote:
An admin who incorrectly considers something
"blatantly illegal" when
it actually is not can always be deadminned later.
Considering that this whole thing is basically a test case in whether
this is illegal or not, "blatantly illegal" seems like just about the
least useful description that could be managed here.
I can agree with that. Of course [[09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56
C5 63 56 88 C0]] seems like a speedy-deletable title anyway.
Can an employee of the foundation please speak up and clarify whether
or not we are allowed to publish this key?