On 12/07/07, Mak <makwik(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Be bold in removing cleanup tags! If the article is cleaned up, it no
longer
> needs the tag. If the person who placed it
disagrees with your removal,
they
> can replace it. Administrators should not
have extra editorial rights,
so it
makes no
sense to wait for one to remove a cleanup tag.
on 7/12/07 4:46 PM, David
Gerard at dgerard(a)gmail.com wrote:
Yep. Admins tend to be experienced editors, but the two are not
synonymous - "administrator" is a janitorial post, not an editorial
one.
- d.
Thanks, David. But what about a case where I add some information to a
fairly large Article that contains the "unreferenced" tag, include the
source of the information I added, but the remainder of the Article may
contain other material that is unsourced?
Replace it with the {{more sources}} tag, I think. I find articles which use
{{unreferenced}} despite having references very irritating, because
{{unreferenced}} is only for totally unsourced articles. It's especially
annoying on articles with a lot of references, but one or two totally
unreferenced (And sometimes just sparsely referenced) sections.
Johnleemk
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: