What was I thinking? You can contact abuse(a)googlemail.com about your problem
without bothering a checkuser. You could also be sly and solicit a response
from him via direct e-mail, by replying to him with direct e-mail. IOW, lie
about your password. That might let you reach his ISP about hacking
potential. In the event that the problem does not go away at source, then
putting a suspected sockpuppet template on his front page will summon a
checkuser to find another reason to block him, and I do not think you need
another reason. I think Mister Lau on wikipedia review will second you if
you need that.
"Abigail Brady" <morwen(a)evilmagic.org>
wrote in message
news:68e55ace0905210832g75a27ee5ha7a36217a2045d9b@mail.gmail.com...
> The headers indicate it was sent through the 'email this user feature':
> my
> mailhost received it directly from
wikimedia.org.
>
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&user=Wp_freedom_f…
>
> indicates the account was created May 10, although it doesn't seem to
> have
> done anything after creation.
>
> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Jay Litwyn
> <brewhaha(a)freenet.edmonton.ab.ca
>> wrote:
>
>> Abigail Brady carbon-copied an e-mail purportedly from
>> user:Wp_freedom_fighter (if you follow the trailing indications of
>> source,
>> which were probably written manually) and that user does not seem to
>> egzist,
>> nor do they seem to hav ever egzisted. All I get on google is games and
>> Sri
>> Lankan war heroes.
>> <a
>> href="
>>
http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=6db52210dc1d573db450917c2f128df3&…
>> ">
>> Unless you count this -CC- to someone else</a>. In other words, this
>> user
>> has nothing to lose but a gmail account, or so they think. googlemail
>> tracks
>> ISPs. An ISP might even be in the received headers. It is best that the
>> complaint come from her and in her own words.
>> _______
>> <a
>>
href="http://ecn.ab.ca/~brewhaha/finance/Manual_Spam_Control.htm<http://ecn.ab.ca/%7Ebrewhaha/finance/Manual_Spam_Control.htm>
>> ">Some
>> clues about how you figure such things out are here.</a> A whois search
>> on
>> X-Originating-IP: XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX might let her bypass googlemail, which
>> is
>> understandably bottle-necked.