Jimmy Wales wrote:
strictly limited. If we had a category of
"things which are widely
regarded, by scientists and others of a similar bent, as being less than
fully established science, but which are often, by those who are not
scientists, put forward as if they were science" then we'd have less
trouble, I think.
How about "disputed science" or "disputed scientific
theories"?
Currently we have [[List of alternative, speculative and disputed
theories]]. I've waltzed around this topic for the last three years,
and I'm convinced that that's about as close as we'll ever get to consensus.
Ec