Sam Korn wrote:
Jimmy Wales wrote:
strictly limited. If we had a category of "things which are widely regarded, by scientists and others of a similar bent, as being less than fully established science, but which are often, by those who are not scientists, put forward as if they were science" then we'd have less trouble, I think.
How about "disputed science" or "disputed scientific theories"?
Currently we have [[List of alternative, speculative and disputed theories]]. I've waltzed around this topic for the last three years, and I'm convinced that that's about as close as we'll ever get to consensus.
Ec