I know, I was just presenting my guess of what his misconseption was.

Brion Vibber <brion@pobox.com> wrote:

On Sun, 2003-05-11 at 18:15, Daniel Ehrenberg wrote:
> Adam probably thinks that an encyclopedia should have
> facts laid out as such, not just vague guesses. It's
> understandable (although I don't agree with it) to
> present speculation as fact to mask uncertainty.
> Certainly other websites do it.

That is the exact opposite of acceptable. An encyclopedia must not
present speculation as fact, as that would be a falsehood.

It may present the fact that there _is_ speculation. That's not the same
thing.

-- brion vibber (brion @ pobox.com)
> ATTACHMENT part 2 application/pgp-signature name=signature.asc