This is totally asinine. It's just a personal attack site. At least
Wikitruth is A: funny at times and B:actually contains recognized criticisms
of Wikipedia, not just personal vendettas.
On 6/27/07, George Herbert <george.herbert(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 6/27/07, George Herbert <george.herbert(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 6/27/07, David Gerard
<dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 27/06/07, Guy Chapman aka JzG
<guy.chapman(a)spamcop.net> wrote:
http://wikiabuse.com
Usual collection of malcontents there to pretend that blocking
spammers is Bad and Evil, but some evidence of sanity as well.
What, in between the stated intent to be a stalkers' site?
How can any site which Willy on Wheels visited and left his precious
droppings all over be bad?
To be serious, though... Rootology put in a policy stating that they
wouldn't use real names unless the WP users in question use them
widely and openly on WP, and from a random sampling of pages over
there, they seem to be enthusiastically enforcing that.
Ex:
http://wikiabuse.com/index.php?title=JoshuaZ&action=history
(second edit was someone taking his real name out, 2 min after article
creation...).
There seems to be far less info on most of us there than on WP.
As annoying as it may feel, having them archive public info about us,
and public comments we make or are made about us, doesn't seem to me
to rise to the level of stalking. Especially if they are actually
following the no-real-names-unless-it's-pointless policy.
--
-george william herbert
george.herbert(a)gmail.com
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l