On 3/1/06, charles matthews
<charles.r.matthews(a)ntlworld.com> wrote:
Slim Virgin wrote
My concern, and I see it too often, is that material is cut because it is
unsourced, and only because of that.
The
'instrumentalist' view, that policy is to be used to rule one's own edits
in, and the edits of others out, is a menace, in fact.
Realistically, when is this a problem, Charles? I confess to being
bewildered when people complain about the need to find sources. If
their edit is correct, why can't they source it?
Are they actually refusing to source it. Or is the material simply
being removed without so much as an attempt to engage in serious dialogue?
Ec