On jargon, I still think "Neutral point of view" was a terrible name that confused neutrality with lack of bias. You cannot sum up a policy like NPOV in a single phrase, so in that case, I think NPOV is better than saying "neutral" something. Sometimes a Wikipedia "term of art" can be misleading and the abbreviation is *less* misleading.
On interfaces, I think the main improvements will probably be in the realm of templates and how references are added. At least that is what I am hoping for. Talking of other interface things, what do people think of LiquidThreads, which looks like it is in use on some wikis now, from what I can see.
Carcharoth
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Tony Sidaway tonysidaway@gmail.com wrote:
The single best way to improve usability of Wikipedia would be to scale back the use of jargon.
if you look at early discussions in those days they were usually held in plain English, with very little jargon. I've tried to keep up that style, but it is now quite rare.
I don't see why this should be. Our policies have perfectly good English language names, "Neutral point of view", "What Wikipedia is Not", "Verifiability", and so on. There's absolutely no need to replace these English phrases with gobbledygook.
We have no strictures against this exclusive practice, mainly because it was seen as obviously undesirable in the early days. But communities inevitably acquire exclusive practices as they develop--it's seen as one way to identify yourself to other people as a member of the "in" group. And so now when I discuss matters on Wikipedia talk pages even I, an editor since 2004, find myself shuddering inwardly at the impact of all the alphabet soup. If the damage this practice does to the openness of the community were more widely recognised it would be possible for us to agree to scale it back, but it just isn't on the map.
in all conscience I cannot see anything wrong with our user interface. It's exemplary, and its having changed so little in all this time is good evidence of that. If we were to try to emulate monstrosities like the ever-changing Facebook it would be a step backwards from our unflinching commitment to a good, clean, simple interface.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l