On 5/13/07, Andrew Gray <shimgray(a)gmail.com> wrote:
do we class those recipients as "notable" in
the same way as
someone who won it by more stringent standards a century later?
Seriously, who cares?
These would obviously be of interest to anyone reading the list of
recipients and following links. As long as the target article is
well-written and well-referenced, the average reader who wanders in
from the intarwebs will enjoy the article, rather than screaming "OMG
non-notable, less than 1,750 google-hits!" and demanding that it be
deleted. That sort of behavior I have only seen exhibited by a handful
of our regular "contributors".
--C.W.