White Cat wrote:
That is an excellent point. What dispute from
those early days of older
encyclopedias encyclopedia (some 2 or 3 millennia old) do we have
articles
on? Did they cover such disputes themselves?
Ultimately such events are
far
too small to be worth an actual coverage. There
isn't much to write about
them as well.
How many encyclopedias are more than a millenium old. What is different
for us is that Wikipedia is not paper. Before Guttenberg there was a
tremendous challenge to getting any kind of information distributed.
These difficulties were bound to have an influence on the notability
standards of the time.
Wikipedia is an important site as you point out
and for that reason. In
the
future any minor conflict on wikipedia will be
news. No one can actually
predict the potential of the project, myself included.
Whether anything will become encyclopedic is difficult to predict. I'm
sure that if you went through old newspapers you would find many
articles about others in similar circumstances that are long since
forgotten. We are big enough to influence notability. Our own debates
on a subject affect its notability. Essjay becomes more notable
_because_ we maintain such a lively debate about him. For that matter,
trolls become more important _because_ so many people insist on feeding
them.
Media gives too much coverage on useless news.
Anna Nicole Smith's death
had
more coverage on CNN than September 11th or a
State of the Union address.
Wikisource includes the full text of all of the State of the Union
Addresses. I don't think that your statement comparing CNN's coverage
of Smith and 9/11 has any basis in fact. Yes, the media do spend too
much coverage on useless news, but as long as people keep watching that
stuff they will keep showing it. Where would the sponsorship go if the
news programmes told the truth about the sponsors' industries.
Also, you're making a value judgment about what's useless. For all we know a
personality cult will form around Anna Nicole Smith in 100 years. After all
the Gospels were all written well after Jesus's death. It's best not to try
to predict the future.
(That said, obviously it's inane. But the inanity of content shouldn't be
our guide.)