On 10/19/06, Rob <gamaliel8(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I've read the article in question, and that's
the kind of thing that
any editor who even saw the page should have removed, not just someone
There's plenty of blame to go around there.
Blame is a waste of time... we need improvements. If you're thinking
about blame you're thinking about the wrong thing.
Oh, please. Two words on a mailing list does not mean
I don't take
the issue seriously or that I'm not one of "the folks who are dealing
with this kinda garbage". Your generalization is inaccurate,
insulting, and unhelpful.
As I said, it sounded like you were belittling the concern, I'm glad
that you've clarified your position. In the future you could avoid
causing me to draw such incorrect conclusion by avoiding
characterizing our response to a terrible attack on a private person
as a response to "an angry celebrity". :)