On 22/02/2008, Rich Holton <richholton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Are any of the depictions based on actual likenesses?
Or even on a detailed
description of the man? If not, then the depictions are not educational with
respect to the man, on with respect to how the man has been depicted.
By this point you should be familiar with the Charlemagne counter
argument. Dito Macbeth of Scotland.
Removing them from the article would be an editorial
decision, not
"censorship" by any reasonable definition of the word.
Only if it could be editorially justified.
--
geni