On 5/30/07, Joe Szilagyi <szilagyi(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/30/07, jayjg <jayjg99(a)gmail.com> wrote:
If WR ever did become newsworthy, we'd still cite the news stories
about it, not WR itself.
We routinely link to articles about a given subject, especially for articles
on websites/Internet entities. Would WR be a special exemption if they were
notable enough for an article? Why is there a link to Wikitruth here:
If that were the case?
So you're saying that if WR were actually notable, and if we had an
article on it, then that would justify having a link to the page. When
else would we link to it, outside of that unlikely circumstance?