Fastfission <fastfission(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I think the ambiguity is necessary -- 10 fringe sources do not
outweigh 2 sources from recognized authorities. But there's no easy
I agree about the 10 fringe vs. 2 authorities. But that has nothing to do with this
scenario, in which the sources are of equal authority. In fact, the very fact that you
turned a non-ambiguous scenario into an ambiguous scenario is evidence that the process
itself is far too ambiguous. It's not just you; I have not gotten 1 straight answer
on this. Are we not supposed to be judging and reporting on the facts as they are, not as
we think they should be?~~~~Pro-Lick
On 5/2/06, Cheney Shill wrote:
*View Moo has 3 sources that support it.
*View Bark has 15 sources that support it.
Which has the majority? Should either be be dropped completely? Should either be reduced
to a footnote or an "other views" section deeper within the article? Again, for
simplicity, all the sources are equally reliable, reputable, and prominent.
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail goes everywhere you do. Get it on your phone.