Please read the decision in your arbitration case. We
will try to answer any questions you have about it.
Already read it. Already asked these questions a loooong time ago in
my case (which you probably didn't even read). None were answered.
There arbitrators, yourself, included, just ruled without bothering to
address what I said.
In fact, you're one of the arbitrators who inserted a whole bunch of
bogus claims in the 'findings of fact' (and even a joke and very
off-the-wall sections that are contrary to Wikipedia policy in other
parts) that were not only wrong, but they were completely unrelated to
the accusations made by the parties involved (such as the 'citing your
sources' thing which was completely irrelevent to the case).
You also added content disputes on the page. It does nothing but
indicate that you, at best, briefly skimmed and didn't read what was
said. Then the other arbitrators just took your word for it and
voted. You could have added a "finding of fact" like "racist remarks
are not appropriate on Wikipedia" and they would have all voted
'support' without checking themselves to see if I made any.
----------------------------------------------
Nathan J. Yoder
http://www.gummibears.nu/
http://www.gummibears.nu/files/njyoder_pgp.key
----------------------------------------------