Oskar Sigvardsson wrote:
If you want to go the bad-ass evil & sneaky
route, simply tag all of
the unsourced items with {{fact}} (an edit which, granted, would take
some time), let them be for a week and then summarily remove them. If
it is as bad as you say (which I don't doubt, after a quick look at
it), raze and rebuild from the ground up is a very sensible option.
In general, I find the {{fact}} tagging to be overdone in Wikipedia. A
better option is to nuke the unsourced material. Sometimes {{fact}} is
warranted, I don't mean that it is always a bad idea. But it is overdone.
I very often see completely preposterous claims tagged with {{fact}},
usually because an editor is being excessively cautious. Be bold. :)
But log in first. Being bold while being logged out generally amounts
to being reverted.
Anthony