On 26/05/07, Ray Saintonge saintonge@telus.net wrote:
David Mestel wrote:
You said Devs said "No" to noindexing given pages, right? It's too bad we can't make a template for all BLPs that injects noindex...
That seems a bit pointless to me: either we want people to find an article or we don't. If we don't, I have a better solution: delete it. If we do, why not let the search engines index it?
Stable versioning has been imminent for a long time now. Perhaps when it is operational indexing should only apply to stable versions.
That wouldn't really solve the problem at all - it's quite possible to have a stable-but-crap article. "Stable" only really means "pretty likely it doesn't say Joe is Gay anywhere"...