Actually I think you're wrong. It has accomplished something. It's accomplished a lot of frustration and the withdrawal of many good editors, and left the asylum in the hands of the inmates.
RickK
Gareth Owen <wiki@gwowen.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
It strikes me that the only (partially) succesful rehabilitation of a
troublemaking user (Lir) came through a ban, rather than any "arbitration."
The addition of a layer of committees and bureaucracy has not, as far as I can
tell, achieved anything of any note.
--
Gareth Owen
"It's not a human or civic right to edit wikipedia."
-- kq cuts to the core of the banning debate
Do you Yahoo!?
Get better spam protection with Yahoo! Mail