On 8/18/06, Sarah <slimvirgin(a)gmail.com> wrote:
There are lots of ways material can be discussed with
directly
referring to it, and people can ask for a reliable source for all
edits without specifying the particular edit that's caused the
problem. We don't need to say: "Do you have a source for the claim
that Professor Sir John Doe was seen with a woman not his wife in a
nightclub last night?"
Sorry, a typo turned one of my sentences into nonsense. I meant to say
that there are lots of ways material can be discussed *without*
directly referring to it.
Sarah