I'm not aware of this and I don't understand the
meaning of not using "primary sources". It sounds
weird. A source is a source -- if it's legitimate,
then why forbid the use of it? Link please.
Note: I wasn't the one to add those sources to the
sub, but I think that whoever did it, did a good job.
--- John Lee <johnleemk(a)gawab.com> wrote:
STEFAN CLAUDIU TIULEA wrote:
Sure it can be expanded, now when Jimbo gave us
another reply on the subject. ;)
I could have sworn [[WP:V]] says something about not
using primary
sources. :p
John
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com