On 8/2/07, jayjg <jayjg99(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/1/07, John Lee <johnleemk(a)gmail.com> wrote:
If I knew nothing about SV and her Wikipedia
history, I would at least
expect my n00b question of "SV, what's this on /. about you supposedly
some sort of spy?" or my n00b statement of
fact like "SV, there's this
thing on /. about you being a secret agent"
to be responded to civilly,
at least a brief explanation, rather than having
them being removed from
talk page without a trace,
If Wikipedia Review started alleging you were a pedophile, do you
imagine you respond civilly to questions of "John, what's all this
about you being a pedophile"?
Well, I would certainly laugh it off as the usual bullshit stunts these
people pull. I would not demand that we salt the earth as if nobody ever
made such allegations.
and people going around asking for revisions with
my question to be oversighted.
Who asked for reversions to be oversighted? If I missed those posts, I
apologize, but I don't recall seeing people ask for that.
David Gerard posted about being asked to do it. He told them to bugger off.