Yes, thats criterion for, say, [[en:WP:RFA]], but at the same time RfA voters are being relatively critical and perfectly good candidates are being denied the position. In addition, users simply won't accept that times are changing and sometimes users can get the experience they need in far less time than previously required, i.e. 4 months can be enough for sysopship when a user makes 20 reasonable edits a day (i.e. 2400 edits), plus many more minor edits.
On 9/5/06, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
On 05/09/06, Akash Mehta draicone@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/5/06, Guy Chapman aka JzG guy.chapman@spamcop.net wrote:
Right after we can sign up another thousand admins to deal with the flood-tide of crap articles that anons create?
Personally I feel that any user we can trust, has a fair bit of experience and a few thousand edits should be a sysop anyway, but thats just my opinion.
Well, that's *supposed* to be the criterion ...
- d.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l