On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Steve Bennett
<stevagewp(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Gwern Branwen
<gwern0(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Now we can {{note|foo}}^W^W{{r|foo}} like
it's 2005!
But seriously, I find this discouraging - a sign of dysfunctionality.
All the work put in to switch to <ref> and now we're switching *back*
to something I find indistinguishable from the original? I guess I'll
be opting out of whatever the next switch will be...
Hmm, I don't recall how {{note}} worked - is the current template what
you're referring to?
Not sure. I drank the <ref> kool-aid and haven't used {{note}} in years.
[[Wikipedia:Footnote3]] explains it all. I can't work out the
difference, except maybe it took Dragons flight a lot of work to give us
what we already had?