On 2/28/06, VeryVerily <veryverily(a)gmail.com> wrote:
*could* do it then why don't you just do it? What it would
prove is that you *can* edit uncontroversially. I would love to be
proved wrong on this.
Huh? Any idiot can make a thousand uncontroversial copyedits. What would
you be wrong about in that case?
I'd just like to point out that "edit uncontroversially" turned into
"uncontroversial copyedits" here - two totally different things. The
vast majority of Wikipedians spend most of their time making
uncontroversial edits on subjects far more interesting and varied than
bunnies and flowers. And they don't have to just be "copyedits" (ie,
spelling and punctuation) either...