Actually, no it wouldn't. The talk pages of
articles are intended for
community discussion, not simply a discussion with one other editor.
Putting editors in a position to have to discuss a Wikipedia editing
decision off-wiki is absurd.
That makes zero sense whatsoever. If an alleged "attack site" posted an
in-depth critique of an article, and a well-meaning user posted a link
to that critique on the talk page of an article, it kinda goes to follow
that the reasoning for that would be so that the community could discuss
and improve the article in question.