Risker wrote:
Actually, no it wouldn't. The talk pages of articles are intended for community discussion, not simply a discussion with one other editor. Putting editors in a position to have to discuss a Wikipedia editing decision off-wiki is absurd.
Risker
That makes zero sense whatsoever. If an alleged "attack site" posted an in-depth critique of an article, and a well-meaning user posted a link to that critique on the talk page of an article, it kinda goes to follow that the reasoning for that would be so that the community could discuss and improve the article in question.