On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 11:08:16 -0800, Ray Saintonge
<saintonge(a)telus.net> wrote:
That sounds very much like sucking and blowing at the
same time. On the
one hand you admit it's not really OR, and then proceed with
consequences based on its being OR.
"Novel synthesis" is the hallmark of original research.
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG